Ghostbusters (2016)

Screen Shot 2016-07-14 at 20.11.10

From the second the news broke that director Paul Feig was to reboot the iconic Ghostbusters franchise with an all female spectre fighting cast, it would be fair to say that the cinematic universe was split in to two divided camps, a camp of people who despaired over what they thought was an unnecessary move destined to ruin a franchise, and a camp of people who couldn’t wait to see what the cast and filmmakers could do to open up the Ghostbusters universe to a demographic who were fairly underrepresented the first time around. I, for one, was in the latter camp, and I couldn’t wait to see actresses I loved take on roles that I enjoyed.

If you have come here hoping for a review that tears 2016 Ghostbusters apart, you have most definitely come to the wrong place, because I absolutely, unashamedly loved it. In this reimagining of the New York City ghost fighting story, we have Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon as Erin Gilbert, Abby Yates, Patty Tolan and Jillian Holtzmann, a team of physics professors, engineers and subway booth employees that band together to form a extermination squad for paranormal presences of different varieties. The central plot focuses on a particular individual who is charging historical ley lines across the city in order to open up the portal between the ghost world and the human world, and the Ghostbusters work to quash these plans whilst evading unhelpful attempts by Homeland Security to stop them. Whilst the minutia of the plot leaves something to be desired in terms of overwhelming intrigue or twists and turns, the sheer sense of fun and joy that emanates from the screen trumps any flaws that the detail of the narrative might contain. I’m not saying this is a perfect movie, it is definitely not, but it is without a doubt the most fun I have had in the cinema since Deadpool, filled with fantastic action set pieces, witty, presumably improvised dialogue between the talented cast and a genuine respect and affection for the history of the universe within which it is operating. In my opinion, the film does a perfect job of paying homage to the original Ghostbusters franchise whilst at the same time carving its own path. What the haters need to remember is that Paul Feig and co. are not trying to erase the nostalgic history of the 1980s movies, they are simply offering a 21st century alternative that can appeal to a new generation and a new demographic, and judging by the dozens of young girls in my particular screening, they should be celebrated for creating four new kick-ass, smart, funny female heroes that can be idolised and costumed on Halloween for years to come. The array of ghouls and ghosts on show make for a vivid and vibrant aesthetic experience, with lots of old favourites and new oddities coming to life to test the skills of the ladies and their proton packs, and though you know there is never going to be any real danger posed to your favourite protagonists, much fun is had in the creative designs and the set pieces that see them come to their frequently slimy fates.

ghostbusters-2016

Alongside the gleeful joviality of ghost slime and super fights, the true quality and beating heart of the film is in its four amazing lead actresses. Kristen Wiig as Erin gives the perfect sort of restrained performance that is bubbling with comedy just under the surface, Melissa McCarthy as Abby gives one of her more enjoyable turns as the ‘sensible’ team member, leaving all of the vulgarity of her more notable performances in things like Bridesmaids and Tammy at home and opting for more subtle humour a la St. Vincent or even Spy. Leslie Jones as Patty is undeniably the most outlandish of the four, giving it all the sass and smart-ass commentary to delightful effect, but not exhausting the audience with too frequent scene stealing. The real star of the show, however, is Kate McKinnon as Holtzmann, the quirky, unconventional and effortlessly cool engineer and inventor of all of the zany weapons and gadgets. McKinnon oozes a sort of androgynous, seductive power that pulls all focus towards her during every scene, and her comic timing and eccentric body language make her the most memorable new Ghostbuster on the block. As a huge fan of her work on SNL I might be biased, but as far as I am concerned, the more Holtzmann on screen, the better the movie is. Of course, without going in to too much spoiler detail, several cameos are made by several stars held dear to the original franchise, and pleasingly these cameos do not overpower the new stars or at all undermine the new direction that the filmmakers are trying to go in.

Overall, my advice would be not to accept the vitriol and hate towards this film before it even came out as reason enough not to go and see it. You will find that, rather than an abomination to the ‘holy vessel’ that is Ghostbusters, this 2016 reboot is full of fun, frolic and affection for an audience that just want to go and have a great time. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I certainly got the hit of nostalgia I was hoping for combined with a fresh and original new take. As far as I’m concerned, the more high profile blockbuster female heroes there are in cinema, the better. I had an absolute whale of a time, and for the record, I still ain’t afraid of no ghosts.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Ghostbusters (2016)

  1. Pingback: Finding Dory (2016) | Oh! That Film Blog

  2. Pingback: Bad Moms (2016) | Oh! That Film Blog

  3. Huge GB fan – and I’ve bred new fans in my 7yr old Son and 5.5yr old daughter. Here’s what I imagine (and hope) comes next after seeing the reboot:
    Much like the memory eraser used in MIB, I think something similar could have been dropped on NY City’s citizens – perhaps disguised as a flu shot or treatment for trauma (like PTSD) after the 1984 and 1989 incidents. (“The cat going back into the bag” so to speak). Maybe the original cast’s cameo personas were actually their new identities as part of the witness protection program. Or maybe they were given forced amnesia. Perhaps that’s why Venkman is a famed debunker – because of his inherit interest in the supernatural natural, his path still naturally evolved in that direction again. Same with Winston – maybe they left him with a stripped and primered Ecto1, so he turned toward the path of Funeral Home’s as the only plausible reason why he had a hurse. I think the original Mayor should be the president and he keeps them in check. But with the cat back out of the bag, and the growing popularity and acceptance now from the government, their amnesia treatment (or blackmail by the president) gets lifted and things begin to naturally evolve while they become government funded. Maybe that’s why Patty heard Zuul mentioned in a recording. Maybe that’s why the artist painted that logo – because it appeared somewhere in his memory.
    Maybe with more than 1 day of shooting, Rick Moranis comes back. But that should be a surprise for everyone and saved for the last cameo or reintroduction – after Peter, Winston, Ray, Janine and Dana make their identities known first. And maybe Egon (or CGI version of him) is a ghost (with his family’s permission of course). I’m sure he would have wanted this. Then all will be right with the world. Enter Zuul, Vinz Clortho and Gozer as seeking revenge on the originals. Muwahahahaha

    • Also, since the latest Ecto 1 got destroyed….finding the dusty original Echo 1 in a barn could be the opening scene for the next film!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s